Friday, 10 April 2009

My 2 Cents (at the current rate of exchange that's actually 0.014p)

So this evening, Ben and I went to St Mike's to watch a screening of The Passion. Rather predictably, we were about 5 minutes late, so arrived as Jesus was praying in the Gethsemene. This was the first time I'd seen the film and I'm still, to coin a phrase from Alyson, ruminating over it, and thought I'd use my first post to try to make some sense of what I'm thinking. (please bear with me, I'm not always the most articulate and lucid of bods)

I thought it was a brilliant film. Extremely, and unsurprisingly, moving. However, I couldn't quite shake off a strange sensation that the film was almost trying to manipulate my feelings in places, although I'm not entirely sure how... I'm no film buff, so I'm not sure exactly what cinematic story-telling devices were used... and I didn't like the feeling that I almost felt sceptical in places...(is it so predictable that I even feel a teensy bit guilty about that?) Was it that I was too shocked by what was shown - I don't think so. I fully expected a film that was brutally and honestly graphic about the kind of torture our Lord endured.

I think that I felt (feel) that the story is (should be) moving enough without having to employ such cinematic techniques. Or maybe my English blood is exherting it's influence, and pushing me into cynicism too readily. I felt that I should be more upset than I was. In short, I expected to bawl my eyes out. I don't often get emotional at films, only when they are really moving. (most notably, I still to this day can not watch the stampede scene in the Lion King, I have to fast forward past the bit where Mufasa dies - mainly because my dad took me to see the film at the cinema, but that's an issue for another day...) I don't think I'm cold and unfeeling, I was very moved by the film, especially by the two Mary's. But I knew how the story would end, and perhaps that was why I didn't feel as sad as I expected; I knew that he would rise triumphantly from the grave.

I must confess to not an insignificant amount of disappointment that more wasn't made of the resurrection. I wanted them to show more of what happened after and what that means for our world today. Although I suppose there would then be too much to cover in one film (at this point Ben suggested that they produce a sequel - something along the lines of JESUS 2: THE RESURRECTION).

I'm not sure how to end this post, which is in a way I suppose fitting as I'm still mulling over the film. I suppose I'll watch the film again someday, and expect I'll feel completely different.

...

3 comments:

David Burton said...

I feel I should have some better response to such thoughts (actually, I know I do, but it's late. You've got me on your flippin' early schedule, you mentalists).

Therefore: for now, check this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1g2TSZ3fpU

apologies for the crappy quality, but it's so very very worth it.

No, no. You're welcome.

Wellers said...

you can always rely on Family Guy to do the sacrilegious!

Wellers said...

you can always rely on Family Guy to do the sacrilegious!